Seventeenth Joint Advisory regarding Pending Motions

On May 18, 2018, the Receiver and the Examiner filed their seventeenth advisory to the Court regarding fully briefed motions ripe for ruling.

To view the advisory, please click here.

For a full and open debate on the Stanford receivership visit the Stanford International Victims Group – SIVG official Forum https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/sivg/



Advertisements

Receiver’s 15th Interim Report Regarding Status of Receivership, Asset Collection and Ongoing Activities

On May 18, 2018, the Receiver filed a report with the Court that discusses the status of the Receivership, the Receivership’s asset collection efforts and ongoing activities.

To view the report, click here.

For a full and open debate on the Stanford receivership visit the Stanford International Victims Group – SIVG official Forum https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/sivg/



District Court Denies Motions for Leave to Intervene

On May 7, 2018, the District Court denied twelve pending motions to intervene filed by Stanford Investors. The Court held that Movants failed to establish a right to intervene because (1) their interests are adequately represented by the Receiver, the Official Stanford Investors Committee, the court-appointed Examiner, and the Securities and Exchange Commission, and (2) given the Receiver’s claims process, disposition of the action does not impair or impede Movants’ ability to protect their interests.

To view the order, click here.

For a full and open debate on the Stanford receivership visit the Stanford International Victims Group – SIVG official Forum https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/sivg/



5th Circ. Affirms Stanford Ponzi Victims’ FINRA Loss

The Fifth Circuit on Friday affirmed a lower court’s ruling confirming a Financial Industry Regulatory Authority arbitral panel’s award that cleared financial services provider Pershing LLC of liability for $80 million in damages sustained by victims of R. Allen Stanford’s Ponzi scheme.

The appellate panel said in a brisk, five-sentence opinion that U.S. District Judge Lance M. Africk was right to uphold the FINRA panel’s decision that Pershing, the clearing broker for one of Stanford’s business entities, was not on the line for losses that a…

To view the full article click here

For a full and open debate on the Stanford receivership visit the Stanford International Victims Group – SIVG official Forum https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/sivg/



Proskauer Looks to Ditch Still-Pending Stanford Ponzi Suit

Ahead of an upcoming Dallas trial, Proskauer’s defense team filed a notice on Thursday with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit as part of an effort to escape claims from an official committee of investors who lost money in R. Allen Stanford’s massive, long-running Ponzi scheme.

Defense lawyers for Proskauer Rose have lodged a late-stage request for a federal appeals court to shut down a case accusing the firm and a former partner of helping R. Allen Stanford to conceal his massive Ponzi scheme from regulators.

Ahead of an upcoming Dallas trial, Proskauer, through its defense team at Davis Polk & Wardwell, filed a notice on Thursday with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit as part of an effort to escape claims from an official committee of investors in Stanford Financial Group—a collection of companies that Allen Stanford used to perpetrate a years-long, $7 billion fraud that landed him in prison on a 110-year sentence…………..

To view the full article click here

For a full and open debate on the Stanford receivership visit the Stanford International Victims Group – SIVG official Forum https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/sivg/