Stanford Ponzi Scheme Receiver Battles Ex-GC For Records

The receiver unwinding Robert Allen Stanford’s $7 billion Ponzi scheme asked a Texas federal judge Thursday to force Stanford’s former general counsel to show why he hasn’t produced requested documents regarding his bank accounts and properties in Texas and Florida in the receiver’s clawback suit targeting Stanford’s legal advisers.

Ralph S. Janvey, the receiver for Stanford International Bank Ltd., says Pablo Mauricio Alvarado, a partner at SMPS Legal who splits his time between Miami and Bogota, Colombia, has failed to comply with the court’s order granting…

To view the full article, click Here.

For a full and open debate on the Stanford receivership visit the Stanford International Victims Group – SIVG official Forum http://sivg.org.ag/



Advertisements

Receiver and Official Stanford Investors Committee Announce Settlement with Hunton & Williams, LLP

On August 16, 2017, the Receiver, the Official Stanford Investors Committee (“OSIC”) and certain individual Investor Plaintiffs filed a Motion seeking Court approval of a settlement entered into with Hunton & Williams, LLP (“Hunton”). Pursuant to the terms of the settlement, the Receivership Estate will receive $34 million. On August 23, 2017, the Court entered a Scheduling Order setting a hearing on the Motion to Approve the Hunton Settlement and establishing a schedule for the submission of objections.

The Court has set a hearing on the Motion to Approve the Hunton Settlement at 10:00 a.m. on Tuesday, November 28, 2017. Any party wishing to file an objection to the Hunton Settlement must do so no later than Tuesday, November 7, 2017.

You may access the materials pertaining to the Hunton Settlement and the HUNTON SETTLEMENT FAQ by clicking HERE

For a full and open debate on the Stanford receivership visit the Stanford International Victims Group – SIVG official Forum http://sivg.org.ag/



$27M In Attys’ Fees OK’d In Stanford Bank Ponzi Scheme Deal

A Texas federal judge approved nearly $27 million in attorneys’ fees on Wednesday as part of a nearly $133 million Stanford Ponzi scheme settlement that he said also merited approval despite objections.

U.S. District Judge David Godbey approved the full amount of the of $26,787,500 request for attorneys’ fees from firms, including Castillo Snyder and Strasburger & Price, that worked on the $132.5 million settlement with the so-called Willis defendants and BMB defendants over their roles in making R. Allen Stanford’s Ponzi scheme seem low-risk and…

To view the Full Article click  here:

For a full and open debate on the Stanford receivership visit the Stanford International Victims Group – SIVG official Forum http://sivg.org.ag/



Receiver’s 13th Interim Report Regarding Status of Receivership, Asset Collection and Ongoing Activities

On June 1, 2017, the Receiver filed a report with the Court that discusses the status of the Receivership, the Receivership’s asset collection efforts and ongoing activities

To view the Report, please click here.

For a full and open debate on the Stanford receivership visit the Stanford International Victims Group – SIVG official Forum http://sivg.org.ag/



Arbitration. Vacatur. District court refuses to set aside arbitration award based on panel’s document discovery rulings.

In Pershing, the defendant, Pershing LLC, sought to confirm an arbitration panel’s decision that it was not liable to a consortium of Louisiana Retirees who fell victim to a Ponzi scheme orchestrated by R. Allen Stanford. The Louisiana Retirees sought to vacate the award.

Pershing was a clearing broker for Stanford Group Company, a broker-dealer controlled by Allen Stanford that sold worthless securities to the Louisiana Retirees. The Louisiana Retirees claimed that Pershing failed to exercise due diligence in its relationship with Stanford that would have uncovered the scheme. The arbitration panel ruled in Pershing’s favor, and the parties then brought competing actions in the district court to confirm or vacate the decision under the Federal Arbitration Act.

To view the full article click Here.

For a full and open debate on the Stanford receivership visit the Stanford International Victims Group – SIVG official Forum http://sivg.org.ag/