Nineteenth Joint Advisory regarding Pending Motions

On November 30, 2018, the Receiver and the Examiner filed their nineteenth advisory to the Court regarding fully briefed motions ripe for ruling.

To view the advisory, please click here.

For a full and open debate on the Stanford receivership visit the Stanford International Victims Group – SIVG official Forum https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/sivg/ 

Advertisements

Receiver’s 16th Interim Report Regarding Status of Receivership, Asset Collection and Ongoing Activities

On November 30, 2018, the Receiver filed a report with the Court that discusses the status of the Receivership, the Receivership’s asset collection efforts and ongoing activities.

To view the report, click here.

For a full and open debate on the Stanford receivership visit the Stanford International Victims Group – SIVG official Forum https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/sivg/ 

Receiver Files Motion for Approval of 5th Interim Distribution Plan

On September 18, 2018, the Receiver filed a Motion for Approval of 5th Interim Distribution Plan.

To view a copy of the motion, click here

For a full and open debate on the Stanford receivership visit the Stanford International Victims Group – SIVG official Forum https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/sivg/



Seventeenth Joint Advisory regarding Pending Motions

On May 18, 2018, the Receiver and the Examiner filed their seventeenth advisory to the Court regarding fully briefed motions ripe for ruling.

To view the advisory, please click here.

For a full and open debate on the Stanford receivership visit the Stanford International Victims Group – SIVG official Forum https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/sivg/



District Court Denies Motions for Leave to Intervene

On May 7, 2018, the District Court denied twelve pending motions to intervene filed by Stanford Investors. The Court held that Movants failed to establish a right to intervene because (1) their interests are adequately represented by the Receiver, the Official Stanford Investors Committee, the court-appointed Examiner, and the Securities and Exchange Commission, and (2) given the Receiver’s claims process, disposition of the action does not impair or impede Movants’ ability to protect their interests.

To view the order, click here.

For a full and open debate on the Stanford receivership visit the Stanford International Victims Group – SIVG official Forum https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/sivg/